21.9.05

Vancouverism

A simply excellent essay about past trends in dense city building, aka Manhattanism, as compared to new trends in dense city building, aka Vancouverism. Interesting collision of random factors that pushed Vancouver to the fore, but I agree that they hit on something that is now referred to across North America as "Vancouver-style". I don't agree with some of the specifics, but the overall posit that Vancouver is leading the way for 21st century cities is a viable one.

A quick review of what sets Vancouver apart. Concocted instantly in the late 1870s as a land promotion scheme for the Canadian Pacific Railway, Vancouver is the continent’s youngest major city – younger than Seattle and Denver, even Phoenix and Calgary. Always a place of innovation in urban planning and housing design, Vancouver has seen its downtown population double in the past 15 years. The continent’s youngest major city with its highest residential density? – iron rule number one of North American urbanism broken.

Broken rule two is just as important. Vancouver is the only major city in North America without a single freeway within its boundaries. Citizen activism in the late 1960s saved Gastown and Chinatown by stopping a roadway with the Orwellian name of the “East Downtown Penetrator,” followed by significant investment in elevated rail public transit.

Rule three is that Vancouver’s current planning decisions are almost entirely insulated from interference by city councilors and mayor. This does not mean unbridled power for planners (land use policy remains politically accountable), but it does allow for decisions in the long-term interest of the city to often prevail over the short-term needs of getting re-elected. Born of our geographic situation wedged between mountains and sea, Vancouver has had a historical legacy of relatively high-density living, taken to new heights by a political culture in which more people per block is thought to be a positive nearly as often as often as a negative.


Rule four has to do with one of the urban forces most difficult to discuss: race. While having immigrant and non-white population ratios comparable to New York, Toronto, and Los Angeles, Vancouver has escaped many of the striations and frictions that come with neighborhoods sorted by ethnicity. The shame of our city is not a racial ghetto, but a chemical one: indeed, the Downtown Eastside is one of Vancouver’s most multi-cultural, multi-racial neighborhoods, one linked by a culture and economy of drug dependency. The Downtown Eastside’s tragedy may well have been exaggerated by urban planning policies that have concentrated social housing and front-line poverty agencies in this district as densely as condo towers are concentrated only six or 10 blocks to the west.

Rule five has to do with the role that developers have in providing the social, cultural, and recreation infrastructure in new and renewed neighborhoods. For nearly 20 years, Vancouver has used a form of social bonus zoning, in which extra density in housing developments is granted in return for such public amenities as cultural facilities, parks, schools, and social housing. After resisting it at first, our development industry likes the current system, one where density is traded for a better public realm, because they find such investments increase the value of their projects.


Read more at ArchNewsNow.

5 Comments:

Anonymous Tobius said...

I live in Vancouver and work downtown and I would just hope that I can see Vancouver as a tourist - to not take my home for granted. Also, I think a lot is pushed forward because as a new city, we have this nagging need to prove ourselves, not just to New Yorkers or Los Angelinos, but to Seattle and even our other Canadian cities that scoff at us.

2:11 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Counsel from elders seems to be a lost treasure. Lost are lessons learned that may contain pearls of wisdom that could have benefited the seeker. Having survived my share of hazardous crossings, I am pleased to be able to share a thought or two. The main lesson is to keep on learning. Read and seek out other points of view like visiting your blog. Finding what is ultimately important has lead me to appreciate actuality, efficiency and mindfulness. Helping others to see some of the forest through the trees is a rewarding benefit of age and maturity. dynamic thoughts

4:56 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

La mia missione � di spargere il chemical dependency field di parola � la parola.Genuinely, Lianne chemical dependency field

7:27 AM  
Anonymous Drug Rehabilitation said...

Substance abuse is a devastating disease that affects millions of individuals and families. Find the right alcohol treatment program for yourself or a loved. It will be the first day of the rest of their or your life.

You can get more assistance at http://www.addictiontreatmentcenter.com .

7:09 PM  
Blogger bemodern said...

When you were in Vancouver I wonder if you stopped to notice the deafening high decibel digital sounds emanating from transit buses at bus stops, and the ear splitting air compression releases at pedestrian baby stroller height or the high pitched shrill sqawking audio produced at pedestrian crossings (note to City Hall, 'Blind people aren't deaf'). You may also have not stayed in a typical shoe box sized condo while there. Your visit may have been short - stay a little longer, long enough for the hazardous city noises to creep in - you'll leave in an instant and be far less gushing. Trust me - this high density thing isn't all it's cracked up to be.

9:23 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home